Hot threadsAccording to a joint statement from House and Senate legislative leaders issued last night, local aid will be cut no more than 4% and all schools will receive foundation aid at a minimum. I will seeking specific computations as to my communities. In my annual budget letter, I reinforced concern re local aid and health insurance reform and expressed a preference for a budget without earmarks. News reports of yesterday’s closed-door house caucus — to the effect that cuts of roughly 5% in local aid are likely — are correct. Groups from diverse perspectives — the Boston Foundation, Stand for Children, the Massachusetts Municipal Association, the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation — are pushing for change in municipal health insurance. I think that the legislature is really beginning to focus on making something happen and I am starting to be hopeful that we’ll have a bill this spring. I want to thank everyone who took the time to comment on this issue before the vote. I read all of the comments. I did vote for the bill. The House did strengthen the bill on the floor in one important respect. We gave the financial overseer the power to trigger a financial control board at any time. Although it is true that Lawrence is a relatively poor city, Lawrence’s financial crisis largely reflects relatively recent municipal management decisions, some fairly attributable to the recently ousted Mayor. And that is grounds for believing that the crisis may be easier to resolve than some fear. Tomorrow, I will be asked to vote on a proposal to assist the City of Lawrence. As of now, I am planning to vote for the bill, but I am still listening — it is a close call. Your thoughts are appreciated. The House took action today on its own version of a driving safety bill. The House version still needs to be reconciled with the Senate version. Regarding Verizon’s proposal to site a tall cell tower in Belmont on Rte. 2 (http://www.wickedlocal.com/belmont/features/x1520846849/Residents-object-to-Verizon-cell-tower-proposal), are there feasible solutions that would improve our cell coverage but which would use less visible antennae? What are the trade-offs? This seems like a reasonable first step to aide Lawrence toward fiscal stability. I have some experience with Lawrence. In the early 90’s, I helped create and run the annual Bread and Roses Festival, which celebrates Lawrence’s labor history. A few years ago, I taught in Lawrence for a year. I’m also in support of the bill – but I think it should be made contingent upon the newly-elected mayor resigning his State Legislative seat. There are still many, many people of out work (my one year anniversary is this month), and even a paid, representative position would help someone else struggling with unemployment. Hi, Will. I am in full favor of supporting the bill. I worked in Lawrence for eight years and have a strong attachment to the place. I agree that unusually feckless government is not the problem. Lawrence has struggled hard since the bust of the mill town days and deserves a [...] I am responding to some comments I have seen here and also thinking about today’s Globe editorial on this topic. on 3/14/10, JonathanRussell said about Local Aid Further Update: Local aid is our money given back to us by the State. There have been thousands of new State jobs created in the last several years. Roll back the [...] on 3/13/10, TomRawson said about Local Aid Further Update: A quick question ... yesterday's news coverage said clearly (I heard this on multiple stations) that the advice was to expect a 4% cut to local aid bu [...] on 3/13/10, IsabelBest said about Local Aid Update: "...what the Unions are saying NO to when they refuse to join the GIC? They are basically sacrificing the jobs of those with the least tenure to prote [...] on 3/12/10, Paul Looney said about Local Aid Update: Thanks for the numbers. So the chart would like this: Arlington Aid Cut $686,000 Join GIC save $5,600,000 Belmont Aid Cut $394,000 J [...] on 3/11/10, LenKardon said about Local Aid Update: Will, Didn't the Senate pass the FMAP extension yesterday? That would bring us the $608M in "questionable revenue", right? on 3/11/10, Judith Feinleib said about Municipal health insurance update: My point was that if people have agreed to a contract and have delivered their end of the bargain, then abrogating the contract is unjunst whether the [...] on 3/10/10, grant.cook said about House passes driving legislation: You don't have to dig very far to find a ton of evidence of the impacts of aging on reflexes, vision, cognitive abilities, etc. These are all things [...] on 3/10/10, Glenn Koenig said about Local Aid Update: Like the Medical Industrial Complex, the education system is headed for a train wreck, and very soon now. Why? Because, like the Medical system, it [...] on 3/05/10, Nate said about Municipal Health Costs and Teachers' Unions: I agree with Tom that I do not like the tone of the Globe articles, and I am not in favor of any law that would allow municipalities to force this on [...] on 3/03/10, ssheffler said about Lawrence financial crisis in perspective: Will, I think you are saying there are adequate resources for a solid management team to do a lot of good. So my question is- how confident are we t [...] on 3/03/10, Paul Santos said about An unpopular vote: Hi Will, Common Cause tells me the NPV vote is up again- has your thinking changed? Thanks, Paul on 3/03/10, CalvinJohnson said about Lawrence -- non-bail-out bill: Lawrence's elected officials need the support and framework of this bill to try to address a gap that comes from being an urban area of just six squar [...] |