There Are Several Dimensions to Non-Competes

Employers, large and small can be damaged by employees moving to the competition. When this happens, it is not only the “employers” that are damaged, but also fellow employees, co-workers and team members who may be damaged by both losing the expertise of the co-worker and by potential weakening of the overall company effort in …

Non-competition additions

Perhaps some form of disclosure should be added to regulations on employment contracts thus creating greater transparency from the start. I fully agree that in the 21st century, 6 months should be adequate but am concerned about the exemptions at higher levels . In areas such as art or music where unique talent is present, …

Six months is certainly long enough – maybe too long?

My only non-compete was as a high tech recruiter / staffing consultant. The length of time should be rational given the sales cycle. The industry standard seems to be a one year non-compete agreement with a 50 mile or more radius from the company’s market area. A year is certainly excessive since within 3 months …

Let’s get as close as possible to the California approach — it makes sense!

Sorry, but I am an absolutist on this. Businesses are giving you a line of BS. There is adequate protection for their legitimate interests in trade secret and other intellectual property law, and in allowing non-poaching agreements, which are very legit. But limiting the livelihood of an employee — their ability to use the generic …

Non-Compete is a Tricky Subject

I have worked as a software engineer for the last 10 years. I have been fortunate enough to work at a company that doesn’t require a non-compete, but I have a number of friends who signed one. It’s a tricky subject. On the one hand, there are some fields where a non-compete is essential to …