Peter Frumhoff, a climate scientist and ecologist, and Cabell Eames, an environmental policy advocate and strategist, join me for a podcast discussion on where we are and what we need to do on both climate mitigation and climate resilience.
We unpack the hard math of net zero, the global emissions split between developed and developing nations, and the reality that warming will continue for decades even as cleaner technology scales up.
Join the conversation! Post your thoughts in the comments below.
Prior podcast episodes appear at my podcast episode page.
A counterpoint to the usual propaganda:
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/a-highly-visual-follow-up-to-yesterdays?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=363080&post_id=189892467&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=bbbk1&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
…and, as of course with Will, Ms Eames has a BS in psychology and precisely ZERO scientific credentials of any kind, so listen up!
It’s not just climate cultism, it’s a hustle.
I don’t love tariffs, but like January 6th and Kapernick’s disparaging of a symbol of national unity, they got attention, and tariffs are functional and necessary tools to deal with totalitarians.
January 6th may have seemed abhorrent, but it opened peoples’ eyes to the fact you can’t have free and fair elections when 95% or more of media is not only coded with liberal propaganda, bit is actively demonizing regular, vanilla, good old American conservatism. Oh, yeah, and the political prosecutions too.
What the left fails to mention with regards to tariffs is that the monetary cost to Americans is a ridiculously small premium for securing a better world for our children and grand children on down the line.
The tariffs will do more to leverage a reduction in global emissions than vandalizing humanity’s treasured art, or gluing your hand to a motorway.
Clearly there’s not going to be a politically soonish solution without carbon sequestration (and addressing methane emissions.) Carbon sequestration seems to be a politically hot topic, but it needs to be included.
So, we’re not going to get there in time.
I’m surprised that carbon sequestration is not seriously discussed. We’re going to need it. That and methane reductions.
Thank you for a timely and expert podcast. I learned a lot about local issues. This is information we need to know as we plan for our long term future.
I love how the other side’s viewpoint is always called “propaganda”.
Get China to do it then talk about it.
Get China to do it then talk about it.
Are the cli!mate resiliency plans for MA localities public information and where are they available? Thank you! Excellent discussion! As a climate advocate, the resiliency issue is an essential component of global warming-climate change that we are already living with.
Yes. Many towns have climate resiliency plans. They are published on individual town websites.
This isn’t a Democrat* effort to reduce Western anthropogenic climate change, this is an effort keep the money flowing to politicians who operate as China’s surrogates and enablers of climate hustlers.
The only way we are going to have any purchase upon the climate thermostat is to “speak softly and carry a big stick.” China’s is not a market economy. By being forced to occasionally swing that stick American power is the only force on Earth that will close Chinese coal plants.
The TDS is real.
*Democrat. Yeah, right.