We took a significant vote this week to reduce the risk of a federal constitutional convention. Such a convention might lead to circulation of dangerous constitutional amendments.
Article Five of the U.S. Constitution defines the process for amending the constitution. To be adopted, amendments require support from 3/4 of the states. However, amendments can be proposed in two different ways: (a) by votes of two-thirds of both branches of Congress; or (b) through a constitutional convention requested by two-thirds of the states.
I have long and consistently opposed a constitutional convention. No Article Five convention has ever happened and there is no clear understanding of how an Article Five convention would work. For example, some feel that low population states would likely have the same vote as large states in a convention. Anything could come out of such a convention.
There is also confusion about how a convention would be called. Through the years, many states have requested constitutional amendments on one or another particular issue. But not enough have spoken to the same issue to trigger a convention. Now some advocates for a convention have proposed that a convention should be called if two-thirds of the states have amendment requests outstanding, even if they are different requests and even if the requests were made decades ago. To prevent this, many states have rescinded all prior outstanding requests for amendments. This week, by voting to rescind all prior amendment requests. According to Common Cause, by so doing Massachusetts became the 17th state to have no pending requests, bringing the total count of states with pending requests down to 33: below two-thirds. Crossing this threshold is a relief.
And the vote to rescind prior calls was long overdue. Pending amendment requests from the Massachusetts legislature went back decades and included a 1977 request to ban abortion. The legislature in 1977 was very different from the legislature now!
The joint legislative press release announcing last week’s vote appears below.
Legislature Votes to Protect Integrity of the U.S. Constitution
(Press release from the Massachusetts General Court.)
(BOSTON—11/19/2025) Today, the Massachusetts Legislature passed joint resolutions H.4692 and S.2684 which rescind all previous applications for a national Constitutional Convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. This joint initiative is in response to concerns that Congress and the Trump Administration could attempt to use prior Massachusetts resolutions to call for an Article V Constitutional Convention to advance their own political agenda, moves that could have broad and sweeping implications on current protections under the U.S. Constitution.
“As President Trump and Congressional Republicans continue to use every lever of government to roll back basic rights and halt progress on critical issues, this preventative measure will ensure that outdated Article V resolutions that were passed generations ago in Massachusetts cannot be used by Republicans to advance their own political agenda,” said House Speaker Ronald J. Mariano (D-Quincy). “I want to thank Leader Peisch and my colleagues in the House, as well as Senate President Spilka and our partners in the Senate, for recognizing the need for this measure.”
“Massachusetts refuses to be party to changing the American Constitution because Donald Trump and his supporters want him to be a king,” said Senate President Karen E. Spilka (D-Ashland). “We are a nation of laws, and today we spoke loudly and clearly that this Legislature insists that we follow them for the sake of our democracy. I applaud Majority Leader Creem for her leadership, each Senator for voting to protect our democracy, and Speaker Mariano, Leader Peisch, and our colleagues in the House for moving decisively for the sake of our country.”
“I would like to thank the Speaker for his support and leadership in bringing this resolution to the House floor. Given the uncertainty surrounding an Article V convention, such a process could present a serious threat to the U.S. Constitution, our democracy, and the civil rights and liberties that are the foundation of our nation,” said House Assistant Majority Leader Alice Hanlon Peisch (D-Wellesley), sponsor of the House resolutions. “Today, we come together in defense of the U.S. Constitution, a document that for more than two centuries has guided our nation, safeguarded our freedoms, and provided the framework for our democracy.”
“Today’s bipartisan vote is a resounding affirmation of our commitment to protecting the stability and integrity of the U.S. Constitution,” said Senate Majority Leader Cynthia Stone Creem (D-Newton), lead Senate sponsor of the resolutions. “By acting swiftly and collaboratively, both chambers are turning the page on these outdated petitions that no longer reflect the values or priorities of the Commonwealth. Massachusetts will not allow our past resolutions to be misused in ways that could undermine fundamental rights or destabilize our constitutional framework. I am grateful to Senate President Spilka for her support in prioritizing this important effort.”
The Legislature’s action makes Massachusetts the 17th state to rescind all prior applications for an Article V convention, and reaffirms that any constitutional decisions should reflect the will of today’s elected lawmakers and the people they represent.
An Article V convention is a process outlined in the U.S. Constitution allowing states to propose amendments if two-thirds (34) of state legislatures call for it. An Article V convention could open the entire Constitution to unpredictable changes, as there are no clear guidelines or limitations on what delegates could propose. While an Article V convention has never been called before in American history, there is recent conservative momentum to add up all active resolutions to meet the two-thirds threshold.
Massachusetts had several outdated Article V resolutions pending before Congress, including one sent in 1977 asking for an Article V convention to constitutionally ban abortions. These dormant calls have been cited in national legal strategies pushing for a convention, arguing they could still be considered active and contribute to the 34-state count. Sixteen states have already taken action to rescind all of their previous calls.
Both chambers of the Legislature voted to approve the resolutions, and the House and Senate Clerks will transmit copies of the resolutions to the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and to the Secretary of the U.S. Senate in Washington, D.C.
###
Statement of Support
Geoff Foster, Executive Director of Common Cause Massachusetts
“A convention of states would hand the keys to our democracy over to a few wealthy, unelected special interests. Thanks to House Assistant Majority Leader Peisch and Senate Majority Leader Creem, the Legislature has built a vital firewall by rescinding all prior Massachusetts applications. Their timely action makes clear that any attempt to twist the Constitution for partisan gain won’t be done in our name.”